TOWN OWNED LAND AND COMMERCIAL
& RESIDENTIAL GROWTH - CARMEL HAMLET
By Connie Munday, Carmel Town Clerk
October 26, 2000
There are differing opinions on the proposed sale of the Town Owned 19 acres and commercial/residential development. Whichever views you favor, here is some history, facts and questions about the land, proposed sale and current development projects in the Hamlet of Carmel.
1.
How did the Town acquire the 19 acres?
Dec. 1981, after planning
for a recycling and composting operation to eliminate bulk from the waste
stream, the Carmel Town Board through
“eminent domain proceedings” acquired the 19 acres for “public use”.
This was back when the “garbage crisis” plagued the town and
carter’s rates were through the roof.
2.
What improvements were made to the land?
In 1982 the town had taken the
land from owners Landau and Shapiro,
paid a partial payment and was in
Supreme Court to determine the amount for final payment.
Meanwhile, the town constructed the road into the property with site work
($137,000), built the metal building ($97,000) and bought recycling equipment
($90,000).
3.
How did the residents feel about the project?
In 1983 local residents protested the composting part of the project;
concerned there would be odors and vermin drawn to the site. The upcoming
election resulted in a new administration taking office in January 1984 and the
focus turned to other issues.
4.
Settlement of land acquisition with road
easement. Late 1984 the Court proceedings concluded resulting in
a total acquisition cost of $325,000 for the 19 acres and granting Messrs. Landau and
Shapiro a 50 foot wide road easement through the 19 acres to their adjoining
property. The easement location was
to be determined and accurately described on the acquisition map within sixty
days after the Town took possession.
5. Lease building for storage – Reject offers from former owners - 1985 through 1988 the town leased the metal building to a private company for storage. The town chose not to market the land for sale because under “eminent domain law” they would first have to offer it back to the former owners. On two occasions, early 1989 and late 1992, the former owner Shapiro sought to acquire back either all or a part of the land. His proposals were rejected.
6.
Highway Department “public use” of
property. In 1989
the town had discontinued the lease arrangement and the Highway Department began
storing the winter salt inventory inside the building and stockpiling sand
alongside. This was a great idea
since the highway trucks no longer had to drive back and forth to the yard in
Mahopac for each truckload of material. Hamlet roads were being cleared in half the time for school
buses and commuters plus the property was being used for “public use”. This
use still continues today.
7.
Proposal to buy the 19 acres for commercial
development - The town never officially marketed the 19 acres for sale.
Now along comes a developer proposing to buy the land to link the Light
Industrial 19 acres with the adjoining Shapiro property for commercial
development. He offered to buy it
for $700,000. and give us a kiddy park.
Negotiations ensued which
recently resulted in a public contract offer of $1,150,000, minus $150,000 if he
“donates” seven acres on the adjacent sloped land for the town’s use.
(If the price came down, we bought the 7 acres). He proposes some kind of big store like a “Gap”, some
smaller retail, residential “assisted living”, restaurant/s, computer chip
manufacturing and a hotel conference center at the top overlooking the golf
course. However, he stated
he cannot actually guarantee any of this.
In addition, we get a “neighborhood park” - he will build us a kiddy
park and an in-line skating rink on
one acre of the property abutting the town of Southeast.
8.
Who is this developer?
Mr. Paul Camarda; the same donator of land for our “Camarda Park” up
on Seminary Hill Road. The
Town Board accepted 47 acres from Mr. Camarda which would have been owned by his
Willow Ridge 71 lot Homeowner’s Association to remain on the tax rolls.
We now own 13 acres of wetlands
and slopes where the park road is being built, 25 acres of parkland for needed
recreation fields/facilities and about 9 acres of useless land abutting the NYC
DEP Croton River. Mr. Camarda would
not allow us access to the parklands through his 71 lot cluster subdivision.
The donated 47 acres are out of the sewer and water districts but his 71
residential lots are safely within those boundaries.
He also developed the new 35 lot subdivision off Rte. 52 on Dyckman Road
and the new “Centennial Ridge” 56 lot subdivision on Fair Street and Hill
and Dale Rd. A total of 162 homes
built or under construction in the Hamlet of Carmel.
9.
“Camarda Park” entrance off Seminary
Hill Road. There is
poor road “line-of-sight” at the entrance to the park so the Town will have
to make major improvements to ensure safe ingress/egress.
Its been stated that the Town and County are going to “fix” it at no
additional cost to you. (all costs will be charged back to the Town’s General
Fund or Capital Project Fund). The Town should be able to
tell you the cost estimate prior to construction.
Does the Town need or have a DEP
Permit for the “park”
road to cross the protected wetlands next to the Croton River?
10.
Carmel
Corporate Center, Stoneleigh Ave. behind Danbury Pharmaceutical.
Mr. Camarda is completing his project for 17 lots for new commercial
development. His final
Environmental Impact Statement is on file at Town Hall.
He was granted “preliminary approval” by the Planning Board in August
this year. His proposals for the
lots include 300 residential units for the elderly and “assisted living”,
another self-storage warehouse, medical office, two new restaurants, another
movie theater, a discount retailer or home improvement business, a good sized
professional office, one large and a few small retail and some sort of indoor
sports business. (Again, none of this is guaranteed). Along with the admitted traffic impacts, Mr. Camarda’s plan
proposes to mitigate by way of another traffic light to the Stoneleigh Ave/Rte.
6 area to which he would contribute an unknown $ amount; it even suggests the
closing of the existing Putnam Plaza signalized entrance.
It goes on to say that a number of intersection improvements that are
currently being pursued by the county were identified in his study as having
existing capacity problems which could potentially be made worse by his
proposal.
11.
Residential Building Moratorium
- Mr. Camarda was successful in
getting his 100 residential housing project (“The Links”) into the Planning Board on the 20th
of September prior to the Town Board’s moratorium resolution adopted that very
evening. What does this mean? I
believe it means that if he quickly gets the project through the Planning Board
to “preliminary approval status” prior to the expiration of the moratorium,
the project would not be subject to the proposed three acre residential
up-zoning. The “Links” would
stay at one acre zoning. I
suggest asking the Town Attorney to make sure this is correct.
12.
The
“Links” - Mr. Camarda’s 100 unit residential project will
be accessed from Fair Street. The
road will swing around the wetland and intersect with Hill & Dale Road. This
intersection will result in a four-way stop or more likely a traffic light.
The 100 housing units will be a “cluster development” meaning that
35% of his land must remain “green”, owned by a homeowner’s association
and remain on the tax rolls. We
don’t know exactly what land Mr.
Camarda is using for lot count to cluster 100 units when the Links property is
only 93 acres. Last we heard, litigation over ownership was still going on by Duke &
Benedict with Centennial. Under the
Town’s Zoning Ordinance one cannot transfer development rights to property
they don’t own.
Could Mr. Camarda be
thinking of using the Shapiro
property on the Rte. 6 side of
the hill for lot count? Once he
owns the Shapiro property he can transfer development rights to the
adjoining “Links” property. Did you know that residential development is
allowed on the Shapiro site?
If he uses this land for lot count he would not be able to develop it
commercially. How would this
affect our 19 acres on Rte. 6? Mr.
Shapiro and Mr. Camarda must know there is a 50’ wide road easement across
our land? Is there a missing
piece to this puzzle?
There are so many unanswered
questions involving the sale of our land and the commercial/residential
growth of the Hamlet of Carmel. How
much more traffic can the Rte. 6 corridor and Stoneleigh Ave. corridor
handle? Are more and more
traffic lights the answer? Will
Putnam Plaza become a “ghost town” like the Baldwin Place Mall when
the “new” commercial sites become available? Did you know there
are still at least 3 vacant stores in the new mini shopping center across
from Handy Rent-All? Should the
town conduct its own feasibility study and traffic study of that corridor of
the Hamlet before we sell it for the proposed commercial/residential
development?
We know the Town Board can
get $1,000,000 for the land, but can they ever again buy good land for
future needs of the Town? We are told there’s not much good land left,
and; what will it cost? What is
the urgency to sell the land now?
Will the town now have to buy
other land to build a salt/sand shed for the Hamlet of Carmel or will the
trucks go back again to Mahopac for each load?
Is the Town Board still considering building this shed on the sewer
property behind Grand Union next to Michael’s Brook?
The sewer district may need that property in the very near future if
the DEP mandates “micro-filtration”.
(that’s a subject for another time)
What about the Town selling
only a part of the land, keeping a few decent acres for the salt/sand shed
and reserving a few acres for future needs?
Certainly, the Town Board wouldn’t mind loss of taxes on this
little bit of unimproved land when they are prepared to take 8 acres off the
tax rolls with Mr. Camarda’s proposal; plus, the 47 acre
new “Camarda Park”.
We talk so much about our quality of life.
We are so concerned with our dwindling resources such as water and
our over burdened road system, traffic congestion, filled-in wetlands and
crowded schools; and the list goes on.
Residents should help decide what is important to the community. They
should talk to their politicians and if they don’t listen, make changes at
next year’s election. An
active community is a healthy community.
Register to vote if you aren’t already.
Call Board of Elections to send you a “mail-in” registration
form. Talk to your neighbors; are they aware of these issues and if
so, how do they feel?
We need complete and factual
information; not kinda, or a
little, or a smidgin. Why
should that be so
difficult? Tell your Town Board
to present you with substantiated facts regarding the potential land sale.
Ask intelligent questions and then ask for a “public referendum”
to vote for or against the
sale. It’s your land; why
not? The sale of this land is a
major consideration in the future of your community.
It’s 19 acres of which 10 are “prime”; on a state highway in
the Hamlet of Carmel. Should we
sell it to be combined with the adjoining property for commercial
development, or the possibility of it being used for lot count for
residential development? All of
it? Part of it?
None of it? Do you have
concerns regarding the property sale? Any
opinions? If so, they
should merit attention from your elected officials.
This letter will be
criticized by those who are anxious to sell our land; they adamantly will
disagree with its content. I
have made statements and raised questions that some will mock, call negative
and resort to personal attacks. I
have expressed concerns about
the extreme development of the Hamlet.
Developers themselves should not be blamed for the ills of
over-development They are smart businessmen.
We must be smarter; and, the
Town Board’s “agenda” should be
in the best interest of the residents of the community; not themselves or any
developer.
Hopefully, this letter gets some people to think and ask their own questions and others to know they are not alone in their concerns. If I achieve either, I have succeeded. We have a beautiful town and caring community; only your voice will determine the quality for the future.
Connie Munday, Town Clerk